| Author |
|
greg Honourary Member

Joined: 20 August 2004 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2865
|
| Posted: 05 Febuary 2005 at 4:16pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
can someone explain in greg terms, what is the difference between 130 and 90nm, ie. the Newcastle and Winchester athlon 64 chips. i could obviously google it but cba at the mo
still umming and erring over upgrading 'ma box' but i think i ought to wait till easter at least and see how money is then 
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
TheGouldFish Honourary Member

The Mapper
Joined: 05 June 2003 Location: Scotland Posts: 3456
|
| Posted: 06 Febuary 2005 at 7:11am | IP Logged
|
|
|
basically, the smaller the size of the tracks that connect all the transistors (the 90 vs the 130) the less heat generated.
So an amd64 3400 at a 90mm core will make less heat then a amd 2000xp.
__________________ TheGouldFish
=============
Fear the Fish
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Harv Honourary Member

TF2 GOD
Joined: 24 January 2003 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2716
|
| Posted: 06 Febuary 2005 at 11:40am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Surely...
The smaller the size, the more resistance, therefore more heat!
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Jaguar-infinity Honourary Member


Joined: 07 October 2002 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 1437
|
| Posted: 06 Febuary 2005 at 11:49am | IP Logged
|
|
|
no because the smaller the process the less power is required to push data through and resistance increases over distance, if the pathways are shorter less resistance.
__________________ All i do at work is hang around all day, shoot stuff or go swimming... when can i do what everyone else does and sit around instead?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
TheGouldFish Honourary Member

The Mapper
Joined: 05 June 2003 Location: Scotland Posts: 3456
|
| Posted: 06 Febuary 2005 at 2:39pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
also there is less metal so less bits to heat up.
__________________ TheGouldFish
=============
Fear the Fish
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
greg Honourary Member

Joined: 20 August 2004 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2865
|
| Posted: 06 Febuary 2005 at 2:51pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
the less metal bit doesnt make sense. smaller current fuses have a thinner wire, so they become hotter more easily (with less current) and break earlier.
but it makes sense that the resistance will be less if it has a smaller distance to travel i guess.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
ChiefPFF Honourary Member

CheesePFF
Joined: 09 September 2002 Location: Scotland Posts: 567
|
| Posted: 08 Febuary 2005 at 4:09am | IP Logged
|
|
|
i take it you are still specin your new PC - may i recommend that you go for a socket 939 board if you can afford it. It should last you longer as far as upgrades go.
from what ive seen -
skt 754 - A64 2800 up to A64 3500 (or 4000?)
skt 939 - A64 3400 up to FX55
Then again i might be talking sh*te. Hmm. Best check amd.com
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
greg Honourary Member

Joined: 20 August 2004 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2865
|
| Posted: 08 Febuary 2005 at 4:18am | IP Logged
|
|
|
yeah it would be 939 if i do it.
but i cant afford it i dont think.
just when i thought i might have enough cash, pay a few bills and bang im skint again. 
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
TheGouldFish Honourary Member

The Mapper
Joined: 05 June 2003 Location: Scotland Posts: 3456
|
| Posted: 08 Febuary 2005 at 3:09pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
yeah when I was looking at my amd64 the 939 mobos were very very expencive and the processors even more so.
So I went with the 754 Damn good motherboard and a damn good processor.
__________________ TheGouldFish
=============
Fear the Fish
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
ChiefPFF Honourary Member

CheesePFF
Joined: 09 September 2002 Location: Scotland Posts: 567
|
| Posted: 09 Febuary 2005 at 3:44am | IP Logged
|
|
|
processorsare the same price as 754 these days, just so as you know
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
TheGouldFish Honourary Member

The Mapper
Joined: 05 June 2003 Location: Scotland Posts: 3456
|
| Posted: 09 Febuary 2005 at 11:47am | IP Logged
|
|
|
yeah Im not surprised, I did get my machine awhile back
__________________ TheGouldFish
=============
Fear the Fish
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |